{
  "verdict": "REPAIR_REQUIRED",
  "summary": "Tài liệu kế hoạch rất chi tiết, cấu trúc tốt. Có nền tảng quản trị mạnh mẽ, định danh ổn định và ranh giới rõ ràng. Tuy nhiên, tồn tại nhiều mâu thuẫn và thiếu sót cần sửa chữa trước khi soạn thảo nội dung.",
  "issues": [
    {
      "severity": "HIGH",
      "location": "Sections: `### Schema dòng quy tắc canonical...`, `### Khuôn ghi nhận bắt buộc cho catalog quy tắc`, `### Mẫu record bắt buộc`",
      "message": "Document defines at least three different, conflicting schemas for business rule records. A unified catalog requires one canonical schema.",
      "instruction": "Reconcile the different schema definitions into a single, canonical schema in `### Schema dòng quy tắc canonical dùng thống nhất trong toàn bộ catalog` and remove the conflicting definitions from other sections."
    },
    {
      "severity": "HIGH",
      "location": "Section: `## Customer, Credit, Sales, Pricing, Discounts, Promotions, and Refunds`",
      "message": "Refund mathematical boundary is incomplete. The validator report indicates a defect and the provided document sample is truncated, preventing verification of a fix.",
      "instruction": "State and type the full `0 < Refund Amount <= Paid Amount` boundary for refund rules. Ensure currency is not defined using floating-point numbers."
    },
    {
      "severity": "MEDIUM",
      "location": "Section: `### Khuôn ghi nhận bắt buộc cho catalog quy tắc`",
      "message": "Source classification values `Verified external source` and `Derived implementation constraint` are used, but they do not exist in the canonical list of six source classifications defined in `### Quy tắc diễn giải nguồn...`.",
      "instruction": "Replace the undefined values with terms from the canonical list (e.g., `Normative standard`) or add them to the list with clear definitions."
    },
    {
      "severity": "LOW",
      "location": "Document-wide structure",
      "message": "The plan does not include a design for a 'Quick Reference' view, such as a compressed table of all rule IDs, names, and statements, which would improve usability.",
      "instruction": "Consider adding a section or planning a separate artifact that provides a high-density, quick-reference summary of the rule catalog."
    }
  ],
  "strengths": [
    "Strong governance framework with explicit artifact metadata, version control, and change history.",
    "Clear definition of source reliability labels (e.g., Project assumption, Verification required) and authority boundaries.",
    "Robust, traceable, and stable ID naming convention for business rules.",
    "Emphasis on creating explicit reasoning bridges (`Cầu nối suy luận`) from evidence to rules.",
    "Comprehensive planning for traceability from rules to needs, requirements, and test implications."
  ],
  "coverage": {
    "junior": "PASS",
    "senior": "PASS",
    "traceability": "PASS"
  },
  "file": "01-curriculum/CANONICAL_BUSINESS_RULES.md",
  "reviewed_at": "2026-08-08T18:34:55Z",
  "model": "gc/gemini-2.5-pro"
}